Members of Congress have accused the White Home of protecting up allegations contained in “lacking” FBI recordsdata by a girl who stated she was sexually abused by Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump whereas she was an adolescent residing in South Carolina throughout the Eighties.
The 37 pages, which aren’t public however have been reviewed by The Submit, embody sickening claims that Epstein started abusing the lady throughout a go to to Hilton Head Island when the accuser was simply 13 and compelled her to carry out oral intercourse on Trump.
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) claimed Monday in a video assertion that the DOJ was “holding again” investigative supplies that may reveal extra of “what actually went on” — and wrote a letter demanding the preservation of all paperwork.
However the allegations, first memorialized in an FBI agent’s handwritten notes in the summertime of 2019, are already contained in different publicly obtainable memos and there’s no proof that the lady — whose identification is understood to The Submit — ever met Epstein or Trump.
There are additionally no public information or accounts exhibiting the financier spent summers within the Eighties on Hilton Head.
Additional, a buddy of the lady who acknowledged spending time along with her there couldn’t corroborate a key declare that the 2 attended a Rick James live performance with Epstein — and declined to reply different questions.
Moreover, the feminine accuser voluntarily stop discussing the alleged sexual abuse with the bureau after searching for to affix a civil lawsuit towards Epstein’s property.
The girl wasn’t compensated as a part of a fund arrange by the executors of Epstein’s property that benefited greater than 100 victims. It’s unclear whether or not she obtained a separate settlement.
Regardless of gaining access to the claims in memos that FBI brokers typed up after every interview, identified in bureau parlance as “302 varieties,” lawmakers like Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) nonetheless declare the DOJ “illegally withheld” details about “heinous crimes” dedicated by Trump.
“We’re witnessing a White Home cover-up of great allegations towards the president by a survivor,” stated Garcia, the highest Democrat on the Home Oversight Committee, in a press release to NPR, which first reported final month on the “lacking Epstein recordsdata.”
Committee members have additionally cited the “lacking” paperwork to argue that Trump must be pressured to testify earlier than Congress — and to power a bipartisan vote subpoenaing Legal professional Basic Pam Bondi for testimony. (Bondi is scheduled to sit down for a deposition April 14.)
The White Home has known as the lady’s accusations “baseless” and “backed by zero proof.”
The Epstein Information Transparency Act, signed by Trump in November 2025, requires the Justice Division to make all of its paperwork associated to Jeffrey Epstein public. DOJ reps have emphasised that any pages withheld from the general public have been “duplicates, privileged, or a part of an ongoing federal investigation.”
Each web page made public is tagged with a so-called “EFTA” quantity, however even after the discharge of the extra 302s, 37 pages gave the impression to be lacking from the sequence of paperwork concerning the girl’s claims, as NPR first reported.
The 37 pages of paperwork include three separate units of handwritten notes which can be 18, 15, and 4 pages lengthy.
One of many two FBI brokers who ready the 302 stories didn’t reply to requests for remark. The opposite couldn’t be reached.
What the 37 pages of handwritten notes say
The notes cowl the primary three interviews with the accuser at conferences in Washington State between July 24 and August 20, 2019. The girl acquired in contact with the FBI shortly after Epstein’s arrest on federal sex-trafficking prices July 6 of that yr.
Although largely matching 302 varieties already made public by the Justice Division, the handwritten notes include two further particulars concerning the accuser’s life — a quick faculty journey to Washington, DC, and a highway journey she took with a buddy to New Jersey.
Notes from the FBI’s fourth interview with the lady, which was carried out on October 16, 2019, and gave the impression to be considerably shorter than the opposite conferences, aren’t a part of the 37 pages — however can be found within the 302 recordsdata recounting the assembly.
In that closing assembly, the lady confirmed up with no lawyer and stated she was within the strategy of acquiring a brand new lawyer to symbolize her in a civil lawsuit towards the Epstein property. She declined to proceed discussing her allegations towards Trump and expressed doubt that the FBI would take any motion about her claims, partially, as a result of the statute of limitations would have run out, in response to the FBI’s typed notes.
“[Redacted] once more requested what the purpose could be of offering the knowledge at this level in her life when there was a robust chance nothing may very well be completed about it,” the FBI 302 of the fourth assembly said.
The FBI recordsdata on the Epstein accuser
In line with the 302 stories, the lady advised FBI brokers that Epstein repeatedly abused her over the course of a number of years as he summered in a rental home on the well-known trip vacation spot.
There are not any different information within the DOJ’s Epstein recordsdata of the infamous financier visiting Hilton Head within the Eighties — a couple of decade earlier than the earliest identified claims of sexual abuse had been introduced towards him.
The girl additionally claimed she ran into Epstein at a Rick James live performance in Savannah, Ga., in about 1985 whereas she was with a buddy and her buddy’s mom.
She advised the FBI that Epstein gave her alcohol and “remoted” her from her buddy and the mom. The accuser claimed to have spent the evening in jail after police discovered her strolling round intoxicated and stated she had been picked up the next morning by relations.
Requested whether or not she frolicked with the accuser in Hilton Head, the buddy couldn’t recall the incident, saying: “I do not know what you might be speaking about. I’ve by no means been to a Rick James live performance.”
Teasing out the Trump allegations
The feminine accuser additionally advised the FBI that, on one event, Epstein drove or flew her to New York or New Jersey, the place she met Trump “in a really tall constructing with large rooms.” Trump pressured her to carry out oral intercourse and he or she bit his penis, she alleged in considered one of her interviews.
When pressed to offer extra particulars about her interactions with Trump within the Aug. 20, 2019, interview, she talked about obtained threatening cellphone calls from strangers however was not sure if Trump had any involvement in them.
The girl’s claims resemble allegations introduced by “Jane Doe 4” towards Epstein’s property in a lawsuit that very same yr.
In a June 2021 court docket submitting, Arick Fudali, an lawyer at The Bloom Agency who represented the accuser, stated the lady’s declare was rejected by the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program.
That program was established with funds from Epstein’s $630 million property and paid $125 million to 136 completely different ladies who accused Epstein of sexual misconduct.
The property has moreover settled claims from dozens of girls outdoors of this system, attorneys for the executors have stated.
It isn’t clear from court docket paperwork whether or not the lady — considered one of eight who initially accused Epstein in December 2019 — obtained any cash from the property. She withdrew her claims in December 2021 and didn’t reply to a number of requests for remark.
Richard Kahn, one of many co-executors of Epstein’s property, gave differing solutions throughout a deposition earlier than the Home Oversight Committee earlier this month about whether or not she obtained a settlement from the property, in response to Democrats on the committee.
Daniel Ruzumna, an lawyer for Kahn, advised committee workers members after the March 11 deposition that he couldn’t verify whether or not the property ever reached a settlement with the lady.
Fudali and Ruzumna declined to remark. Garcia, Whitehouse, and reps for Democrats and Republicans on the Oversight Committee didn’t reply to requests for remark.
