A South Carolina choose discovered Alex Murdaugh’s crime reporter and podcaster, Mandy Matney, in civil contempt and ordered her to pay $171,500 in attorneys’ charges and prices, plus a $5,000 wonderful, after concluding she willfully refused to adjust to a subpoena in litigation tied to the Murdaugh household.
In a 22-page order filed Monday, Circuit Decide R. Keith Kelly concluded Matney intentionally disregarded a sound subpoena and prior courtroom order requiring her to look for a deposition, rejecting her declare that security issues justified her refusal.
The contempt discovering stems from long-running civil litigation arising from the 2019 boat crash that killed Mallory Seashore.
Parker’s comfort shops are among the many defendants accused of promoting alcohol to underage Paul Murdaugh earlier than the deadly crash, and Matney was subpoenaed as a non-party witness.
Seashore, 19, was killed within the February 2019 crash in Beaufort County.
Paul Murdaugh was later charged with boating below the affect, however these prices had been dismissed after he and his mom, Maggie Murdaugh, had been fatally shot on the household’s Colleton County looking property in June 2021.
The Seashore household’s civil lawsuit in opposition to members of the Murdaugh household and Parker’s alleges the comfort retailer chain illegally offered alcohol to the underage Paul Murdaugh earlier than the crash.
The litigation finally helped expose Alex Murdaugh’s funds as investigators uncovered the disgraced legal professional’s monetary crimes.
Kelly wrote that Matney refused to look on the Bluffton deposition website on March 27 regardless of acknowledging she understood the courtroom had denied her efforts to quash the subpoena and ordered the deposition to proceed. As an alternative, she remained at one other regulation workplace in Bluffton whereas Parker’s attorneys waited on the seen location.
The order notes Matney appeared by Zoom from one other regulation workplace in Bluffton.
“Primarily based upon the foregoing, there’s clear and convincing proof that Ms. Matney’s failure to look was not the results of confusion, mistake, or lack of ability, however quite was a deliberate determination to ignore the subpoena and the Court docket’s March 16, 2026 Order requiring that she be deposed inside 14 days,” Kelly wrote.
Kelly additionally discovered Matney’s rationalization that she feared for her security was not credible, writing there was “no persuasive proof” supporting her allegations that Parker’s attorneys had been making an attempt to harass her or place her at risk.
Kelly pointed to Matney’s social media posts after the aborted deposition, together with images exhibiting her consuming lemon pound cake with legal professional Mark Tinsley and later eating in Savannah.
The choose wrote the posts “proof her intent to defy her obligation to look on the seen deposition location.”
Parker’s attorneys initially sought greater than $310,000 in charges and prices, however Kelly lowered the award by almost 45%, ordering Matney to pay $171,500, plus a $5,000 wonderful.
The courtroom awarded $39,900 to Bannister, Wyatt and Stalvey, LLC; $45,950 to Deborah B. Barbier, LLC; and $85,650 to Maynard Nexsen, PC.
Matney criticized the ruling on Monday in a Fb publish.
“I’m not indignant that Decide R Keith Kelly discovered me in contempt of courtroom. I’m indignant that he’s ordering me to pay an unprecedented quantity of authorized charges ($171,000 + $5,000 in fines),” she wrote.
“The South Carolina Justice system is strictly what I’ve been saying all alongside — CORRUPT,” she added. “And that is my punishment for calling it like it’s.”
Kelly wrote there was “no persuasive proof” supporting Matney’s repeated allegations that Parker’s attorneys had been utilizing the deposition course of to harass or bully her.
He additionally concluded the contempt proceedings resulted from Matney’s personal conduct, writing that had she appeared for her deposition or accepted certainly one of a number of alternate places provided, “she wouldn’t be earlier than the Court docket on a contempt movement.”
