A high Hollywood producer is engulfed in a poisonous battle with far-left Los Angeles activists after they painted him as a “bigoted puppet-master” for opposing a controversial homeless housing undertaking.
Charles Rosin, who labored on 90210, Beverly Hills and Dawson’s Creek, tore aside the social justice warriors for the “devastating” character assassination.
The 74-year-old has been at odds with lefties from the LA Ahead group and Metropolis Council candidates ever since he launched a combat in opposition to the plans.
Venice Neighborhood Housing, an area nonprofit, desires to construct a 120-unit homeless housing block that may price taxpayers a staggering $2.5 million per unit.
The undertaking, which was first floated ten years in the past, has been paused after Rosin and fellow neighbors filed a lawsuit claiming it was too costly, dangerous for the atmosphere and didn’t undergo the correct processes.
Far-left Metropolis Council candidate Faizah Malik and Venice Neighborhood Housing sued the town two years in the past for not shifting ahead with the thought.
The lawsuit accused Mayor Karen Bass, Metropolis Legal professional Heidi Feldstein Soto and Councilmember Traci Park of siding with a “well-resourced, predominantly white minority” against the undertaking.
Additionally they lately subpoenaed Rosin for all his communications on the matter.
In courtroom paperwork, organizations combating for the event painted him as a “bigoted puppet-master,” arguing that he opposed the undertaking as a result of it was proposed by individuals of shade and primarily meant to serve communities of shade, the paperwork say.
However Rosin revealed he takes the battle again to them, ridiculing the bigotry claims and mentioning his opposition is solely primarily based on coverage and land use.
He instructed the California Submit: “What makes this so devastating is except someone is overtly utilizing racist rhetoric or advocating racist insurance policies, how are they presupposed to show they’re not racist?”
He continued: “They’ve put me within the place of getting to spend my very own sources attempting to show I’m not a racist, regardless that there has by no means been something in my life to counsel that’s true.
“There are such a lot of examples all through my life. However how do you show you’re not racist?” Rosin stated he believed his lengthy public file would clarify the combat over Venice Dell was nearly land use.
He additionally stated utilizing authorized avenues to silence personal residents like him set a harmful priority.
He added: “Why ought to anyone get entangled with the powerful coverage points dealing with us if the last word consequence goes to be character assassination?
“I erroneously assumed that as a person, I had the approval of taking part as a result of all I ever thought would occur is that finally the councilman would hear what all people within the neighborhood was after and search for compromise.”
Final week Rosin was served with courtroom paperwork after turning into the figurehead for the motion in opposition to the undertaking.
He’s certainly one of three administrators of the Coalition for Protected Coastal Growth, a volunteer neighborhood group shaped in 2021 to wage a authorized and public combat in opposition to Venice Dell.
The group stated its objections centered on flooding dangers, tsunami hazards, visitors, parking loss, seashore entry and hovering taxpayer prices.
Rosin’s lawyer Christian Wrede stated the racism accusation grew to become the muse for the aggressive subpoena marketing campaign focusing on him and the tiny volunteer-run group.
He instructed The Submit: “Their idea of relevance was that the coalition was form of the core of this group of homeless-hating, white racists who by some means bought the town’s high brass to do their bidding and squash the undertaking.”
However public data present the undertaking is controversial amongst extra than simply the group, with Wrede pointing to the Venice Neighborhood Council’s opposition and LADOT’s warnings about legal responsibility issues.
Some distinguished black Venice households additionally opposed having their title related to the undertaking, asking to have it eliminated.
In January, coalition members urged the town to proceed combating the lawsuits, calling the event a “boondoggle beneath the guise of group profit” and warning prices may hit $233 million.
Malik, one of many attorneys tied to the unique LA Ahead lawsuits, entered the Metropolis Council race in opposition to Park in 2025, with Venice Dell turning into a central marketing campaign challenge.
She stated: “I used to be proud to be one of many lead attorneys on the Venice Dell case when it was filed — a good housing lawsuit on behalf of group members and taxpayers who’ve been harmed by the years lengthy obstruction of inexpensive housing on the Westside.
“I can not touch upon latest litigation technique as I’ve been ethically walled off from the case since I filed to run for workplace with the intention to shield the integrity of the case.”
Legal professional Jonathan Jager, from Public Counsel, which is representing LA Ahead, added: “Public Counsel represents a nonprofit and Los Angeles residents harmed by the Metropolis’s obstruction of a duly permitted inexpensive housing undertaking.
“Our lawsuit is about bringing desperately wanted inexpensive housing to some of the costly communities in Los Angeles — housing that may serve disabled residents and folks working their approach out of homelessness.
“Subpoenas are an ordinary software in any litigation, and Mr. Rosin is a fabric witness. Our purchasers allege that Metropolis officers interfered with this undertaking partly as a result of a vocal group of residents, together with Mr. Rosin, opposed inexpensive housing meant for disabled and previously unhoused individuals of their neighborhood.
“This subpoena has nothing to do with Mr. Rosin’s opinions. Nobody is questioning his proper to carry them, and he’s not on trial.
“We’re looking for paperwork, pursuant to our rights beneath state legislation, which are related to our purchasers’ allegations.
“This course of is about uncovering the information, guaranteeing accountability, and permitting this truthful housing lawsuit to maneuver ahead.”
