Former JPMorgan banker Chirayu Rana’s salacious lawsuit accusing his feminine boss of forcing him to be her “intercourse slave” is probably going falling aside on the seams, authorized consultants informed The Submit.
Current developments within the sensational Manhattan case — together with Rana’s unique lawyer trying to exit hours earlier than a listening to and the plaintiff’s hiring of a slew of new pricy attorneys attempting to ditch state courtroom for a federal venue — are indicators of “emotional desperation” and a failing lawsuit, they stated.
“He, in my view, doesn’t have a case,” stated employment lawyer Nicole Brenecki.
One obvious indication of the case’s issues is that Rana’s new five-member authorized workforce moved to drop it in state courtroom final week and refile it in federal courtroom, citing “new” proof and federal statutes.
On paper, the transfer has no main procedural or strategic profit besides one: Rana might be fleeing state courtroom after going through a no-nonsense choose who vocalized skepticism at their first listening to final month, the consultants stated.
“It’s the identical nature of the accusations and the identical reduction, which signifies that they’re seemingly forum-shopping,” Brenecki stated.
Choose Dakota Ramseur — who Brenecki argues earlier than commonly – is “so no-nonsense, no bulls–t” and has no endurance for frivolous fits clogging the state courtroom system, she stated.
Brenecki added that Ramseur’s remark urging an out-of-court decision within the case “was not a fantastic signal for [Rana].
“Translated into layman’s phrases: this case is such nonsense, and it shouldn’t occupy the courtroom’s docket,” Brenecki stated.
One other lawyer, David Ring, stated that whereas Rana’s causes for swapping out state courtroom for federal jurisdiction could also be professional, he’s simply as more likely to be “attempting his luck with a unique choose in federal courtroom.
“Rana might be in for a impolite awakening if he filed a very bogus lawsuit that destroyed an harmless individual’s fame,” Ring stated. “Federal judges is not going to tolerate that sort of misconduct.”
Brenecki added of the plaintiff’s camp, “I feel the statements they make to the press, that there’s new proof and the federal statutes — that is seemingly not the actual purpose” for the courtroom swap.
“They’re simply attempting to get a brand new, recent begin in a brand new venue.”
But it surely might be much more of an uphill battle for Rana, consultants stated.
“The whole lot is below a microscope, each deadline is definitely enforced on the day it’s missed,” Brenecki stated of federal courtroom. “So, in case you even have a s–t case, you then shouldn’t be placing it in federal courtroom.”
Comply with the most recent on the weird JPMorgan banker ‘intercourse slave’ allegations:
A choose or the defendants has to log out on the venue swap since Rana initiated the state case.
And that brings yet one more drawback: The transfer will seemingly be met with calls for for Rana to pay for defendant LornaHajdini’s and JPMorgan’s white-shoe attorneys for his or her dalliance in state courtroom.
Longtime employment lawyer Susan Crumiller, who focuses on intercourse abuse and office discrimination, stated these payments might simply already be above six-figures.
A separate crimson flag involving the case occurred when Rana’s first lawyer, Daniel Kaiser, moved to ditch his shopper on the morning of a listening to designed to maintain the plaintiff’s title nameless — a request instantly denied by Choose Ramseur, consultants stated.
“The desperation to get out of that anonymity listening to, like attempting to get it postponed the morning of the listening to … It’s onerous to not infer a degree of some kind of emotional desperation,” Crumiller stated.
“One frequent factor that occurs is new info emerge that harm a shopper’s credibility, and you could possibly assume: No person’s going to consider our shopper, and even worse: I don’t consider my shopper anymore.”
Rana’s unique lawsuit in Manhattan Supreme Courtroom detailed claims that fellow banker Hajdini sexually and racially abused him — together with with threats of retaliation except he turned her “intercourse slave.”
Hajdini filed a blistering countersuit, claiming defamation and that Rana’s submitting has ruined her life.
Consultants stated the courtroom papers on the coronary heart of the criticism have been already setting off alarm bells.
Though the allegations “are extremely particular,” Rana’s authorized workforce has barely filed any proof backing up their claims — together with the supposed “substantial new proof” cited final week, they stated.
Crumiller stated it was odd that the entire juicy particulars “allegedly occurred verbally,” particularly when a lot of latest communications are by textual content and electronic mail.
“It offers pause in case you don’t have related allegations that it occurs in writing, too,” she stated.
That leaves a elementary query unanswered for Crumiller: “How are you going to show your case?”
