The embattled son of a Hollywood director is preventing again towards the water polo star who accused him of disgusting underwater intercourse assaults.
Lucca Van der Woude’s authorized staff filed a movement to strike massive swaths of accuser Aidan Romain’s grievance, in response to courtroom paperwork obtained by the California Publish.
His authorized staff marked 72 sections of Romain’s grievance to be stricken from the document for “groundless and irrelevant references to extremely disparaging feedback, information articles, sealed and confidential data of juvenile proceedings,” and for allegedly disclosing confidential pupil data.
“The Legislature has erected the strongest attainable confidentiality protections round juvenile courtroom proceedings and data,” Van Der Woude’s attorneys wrote in courtroom papers filed Tuesday with Decide Lauren A. R. Lofton earlier than an Aug. 6 listening to. “Plaintiff has chosen to weaponize these data, attaching them as reveals to a publicly filed verified grievance.”
Within the grievance, Romain accuses Van der Woude of grabbing his butt and inserting his finger in it. He additionally accuses Van der Woude and different teammates of racism towards him, saying there have been a number of situations during which he was racially focused and referred to as slurs, together with a brief type of the N-word.
Van der Woude was arrested on suspicion of sexual assault in February on the elite Harvard-Westlake faculty he attended with Romain.
On November 7, 2024, he was admitted to juvenile courtroom for sexual penetration with a international object towards a minor below a plea deal; the cost involving Aidan was later dropped.
One of many key components of the grievance Van der Woude is trying to strike is part of the reporting inside the grievance from the Orange County Register that claims Van der Woude “admitted in Los Angeles County Juvenile Division Court docket … to sexual penetration with a international object (digital penetration) towards a minor” as a part of a plea settlement with the Los Angeles County District Legal professional’s workplace.
One other part Van der Woude is making an attempt to strike discusses racism and antisemitism allegations towards Van der Woude.
It says that Van der Woude expressed “racist, antisemitic, and white-nationalist beliefs throughout the interval during which he sexually and bodily abused Plaintiff and different college students.”
An nameless witness advised Romain’s legal professional, Daniel Watkins, that Van der Woude “had a historical past of creating antisemitic remarks whereas interacting with friends on-line and in individual” and that he “referred to a Jewish peer utilizing antisemitic slurs and acknowledged phrases to the impact of: ‘You silly Jew, die within the oven.’”
A lot of what Van der Woude’s authorized staff is making an attempt to strike from the document comes from the OC Register’s reporting, which comes from confidential juvenile courtroom proceedings.
The movement to strike submitting states: “Plaintiff’s reliance on the OC Register Article because the conduit for pleading the substance of the juvenile proceedings doesn’t present an unbiased foundation for inclusion of this data.”
“Media reporting that itself attracts upon confidential juvenile data doesn’t launder these data into usable civil allegations, nor does it create a ‘public area’ exception to part,” they added.
“A newspaper might select to report on a juvenile matter—and this Court docket needn’t, and this movement doesn’t, search to unring that bell.”
Van der Woude legal professional Lea E. Gierut wrote in an accompanying submitting that she tried to resolve variations with Romain’s authorized staff as lately as July 2, however her efforts failed. She stated the 2 events “remained at an deadlock on a number of key points” at their final assembly.
“Regardless of my efforts, the events had been unable to resolve objections raised throughout the meet and confer course of,” she wrote.
Different allegations leveled at Van der Woude embrace that he and a teammate “whipped” Romain within the weight room with a sports-equipment-grade soar rope in what the swimsuit describes as “a re-enactment of slavery,” whereas saying, “Get again to work!”
He stated Van der Woude “continually dehumanized” him and used the N-word slur recurrently.
“They weren’t making an attempt to cover it,” Aidan stated. “When the lights would flip off, they might say, ‘The place’s Aidan?’ or ‘The place’s arbitrary black individual?’”
Court docket proceedings will proceed subsequent month in Romain’s lawsuit towards Van der Woude, Harvard-Westlake, and high-ranking faculty officers.
Van Der Woude has maintained his innocence within the accusation of harassment towards him.
His attorneys stated: “We don’t intend to litigate this matter within the media. Mr. Van der Woude’s denials and different responses shall be clear and unambiguous in his protection to the Grievance at hand.”
